anything
AirNav RadarBox
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 


Author Topic: Log data analysis results  (Read 29873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #30 on: May 18, 2010, 04:08:08 PM »
Email sent re evaluation of the Professional version.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

shaun

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #31 on: May 18, 2010, 05:01:12 PM »
Maybe this is related?
10 NM NW of EGMC
Essex
UK

Runway 31

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33499
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #32 on: May 18, 2010, 05:10:15 PM »
Nothing related Shaun, just the crew havent done the flight ID for the flight, hence no company logo.

Alan

shaun

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #33 on: May 18, 2010, 05:25:25 PM »
I can't see what's wrong.
10 NM NW of EGMC
Essex
UK

DaveG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 543
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #34 on: May 18, 2010, 05:37:04 PM »
What is wrong is two things.

First, your issue does not relate to the current discussion in this thread.

Second the reason your not seeing a company logo is because there is no valid FlightID for that record.  Notice it has 0000000, if it had something like RYR1075 then you'd see a RyanAir logo, if BAW95 then a British Airways logo.  The crew of your aircraft have not entered into their system a FlightID.
Cornwall, UK

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #35 on: May 20, 2010, 04:45:04 PM »
Email sent re evaluation of the Professional version.

My thanks to AirNav for the evaluation copy of RadarBox Professional.

Unfortunately my tests have shown that it, too, suffers from the "hex code confusion" bug (whereby flight details for one aircraft are recorded against a different aircraft whose hex code differs by a few bits). 

An example this afternoon was G-BYAT B752 400573 TOM71E showing details belonging to G-CIVB B744 400551 BAW287.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

malc41

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 586
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #36 on: May 20, 2010, 07:22:17 PM »
Dave

Which version of software did this start with?

15 Miles East of EGNJ

malc41

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 586
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #37 on: May 20, 2010, 08:19:48 PM »
Dave

Not sure if this is the same problem that you experience?  From todays log

400EBE  GBYWB                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 09:05:07 
400EBE  GBYWG                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 13:52:29 
400EBE  GBYWI                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 13:12:36
also

400EEE  GBYUJ                    G-BYVR  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 14:03:18 
400EEE  GBYVR                    G-BYVR  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 08:17:51
15 Miles East of EGNJ

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #38 on: May 20, 2010, 08:55:05 PM »
Not sure if this is the same problem that you experience?  From todays log

400EBE  GBYWB                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 09:05:07 
400EBE  GBYWG                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 13:52:29 
400EBE  GBYWI                    G-BYWI  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 13:12:36
also

400EEE  GBYUJ                    G-BYVR  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 14:03:18 
400EEE  GBYVR                    G-BYVR  G115  Vt Aerospace Ltd     2010/05/20 08:17:51

That does indeed look odd, but it's a different issue (probably related to the aircraft database) whereas the bug I'm concerned about relates solely to the data coming from the aircraft (hex code, callsign, squawk, altitude, etc) and isn't related to database lookups.

In answer to your other question about what version of the software the "hex code confusion" bug started with - I have no idea, in fact I'm not even sure whether it's a software or a firmware bug, to be honest.

I could do trials with previous RB versions, but there isn't really much point as most people are on 3.13 or 4.03 now.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

malc41

  • RadarBox Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 586
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #39 on: May 20, 2010, 09:02:34 PM »
Dave

Thanks for that, it was just in the back of my mind that this issue has been around for some time.

15 Miles East of EGNJ

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #40 on: May 24, 2010, 07:25:46 AM »
Thanks for that, it was just in the back of my mind that this issue has been around for some time.

So it would appear - no criticism of the beta-testers intended :-)

To be fair, many enthusiast RadarBox users probably wouldn't be too worried about two aircraft in the list with the same squawk or callsign, or a sudden unexplained jump in altitude (although, as you say, a number of individuals have posted examples).

It's likely to be professional users of RadarBox (and now, it would appear, AirNav Flight Data) who are most affected - the ADS-B application I'm currently working on would certainly be screwed up by, for example, an A320 reappearing at FL380 5 minutes after it has landed, so RadarBox is no longer an option that I'm prepared to offer the client.

Hopefully that will change soon - I would expect that AirNav are reviewing their decoding algorithms even as we speak ...

Dave
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #41 on: May 24, 2010, 07:37:33 AM »
Yes we are taking a look at this and will be added to the bugs page.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

tarbat

  • ShipTrax Beta Testers
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4219
    • Radarbox at Easter Ross
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #42 on: May 24, 2010, 09:50:57 AM »
I note that on the bug tracking system, you say:
"Occurs mainly in high message areas where Mode-S confusion can occur, mainly as an aircraft lands"

I'm not sure that is true.  Firstly, I'm in an area with low message volumes.  And I've taken port 30003 data, and analysed in Excel.  Out of 45,000 messages, I found two cases of mixed up altitudes.  One aircraft was at FL235 when it suddenly reported an altitude of FL390, and the other was at FL105 when it suddenly reported an altitude of FL390.

In both cases, the ModeS hex codes were different by two bits.
400619 (FL235) vs 400409 (FL390)
010000000000011000011001
010000000000010000001001

400AD1 (FL105) vs 400A99 (FL390)
010000000000101011010001
010000000000101010011001
« Last Edit: May 24, 2010, 10:14:56 AM by tarbat »

DaveReid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
    • Heathrow last 100 ADS-B arrivals
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #43 on: May 24, 2010, 11:09:17 AM »
I don't understand the reference to aircraft landing, either.

The bug appears to affect aircraft in all phases of flight, although of course it's easier to spot when there is a wide discrepancy in altitude between the two aircraft, e.g. if one is landing and one is en-route.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

AirNav Support

  • AirNav Systems
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
Re: Log data analysis results
« Reply #44 on: May 24, 2010, 12:55:39 PM »
Its just related to the ones we have caught during testing. Don't worry its all written down in detail elsewhere.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]