Hi Dave,
I was not questioning your (the company that is) level of QC - rather suggesting the possibility that of possibly those who supply the components - a thing over which AN may have little direct control- may be where the root cause of SAW filter problems lay.
"SAW" filters by their "nature" are sensitive to ESD, as compared to (for instance) "HELIX" filters, that, as an alternative will be found to form "Bandpasses" in a receivers front end for its "frequency range of interest", and to be an ideal application in the frequency range that transponders are supposed to operate. The increased "sensitivity" of the "SAWs" to ESD has to be taken care of by protective measures. If interested you may read about here for instance:
http://www.epcos.com/inf/40/ds/ae/B3773.pdf.
(> PAGE 6)If intersted in "HELIX filter" fundamentals, have a look here:
http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/helical-resonator.htm"SAW filters" to be desribed here (just as an example):
http://www.saw-device.com/pdfs/what_is_a_saw_filter.pdfSo, as a conclusion, a SAW filters susceptibility to ESD finally is a question of how well it is protected against.
Helix filters, by their design, are not required to have additional protection.
Kind regards
Karl